Whenever advocates work to spare the lives of animals, there are invariably those who criticize them by arguing that animals are less important than people and we should ignore one in deference to the other. It is a tragically commonplace argument, but no less indefensible because of it. In effect, they are arguing that compassion is zero-sum, that it ought to be doled out in a miserly fashion, and that unless and until we end all human suffering, we should ignore the harm to every other earthling who shares our planet —
Our Endless Well of Compassion
Whenever advocates work to spare the lives of animals, there are invariably those who criticize them by arguing that animals are less important than people and we should ignore one in deference to the other. It is a tragically commonplace argument, but no less indefensible because of it. In effect, they are arguing that compassion is zero-sum, that it ought to be doled out in a miserly fashion, and that unless and until we end all human suffering, we should ignore the harm to every other earthling who shares our planet —
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.